As part of The Entrepreneurial Audit (a joint project from the RSA and Crunch) twenty policy ideas have been proposed to strengthen self-employment in the UK. Over the coming weeks we’ll be examining each of them, demystifying the more complex aspects, and airing the best arguments for and against them. The first proposal we’ll be focusing on is one that would see the Government equalising National Insurance contributions (NICs) for employees and the self-employed.
Currently, self-employed workers doing the same work as employees pay less in National Insurance contributions, and the report concludes that this needs levelling out.
Now, it may seem a bit odd that a policy proposal to help the self-employed would result in them contributing more tax – but hear us out. Yes, paying less can be seen as somewhat of a perk, but the report highlights some major disadvantages with the system as it is.
Employers are being incentivised to misrepresent workers
Under the current rules (February 2017), a self-employed person earning £15,000 a year has to pay £770 in NICs, but an employee doing the same job would see the higher sum of £833 deducted from their pay packet. Notably, their employer would also be required to add a further £951 (13.8% of employee earnings above £8,112) in NICs.
This levy on employers creates a financial incentive for them to misclassify workers as self-employed, which in turn denies workers the rights they would otherwise be entitled to as an employee – for example holiday pay, sick pay, the minimum wage, and pension contributions.
Equality creates a better argument for more rights
One of the main existing arguments against giving self-employed workers more fundamental rights is that they already receive more entitlements than their contributions merit.
Such a disparity creates holes in the argument for extending more rights and benefits to small business owners, and thus delays progress.
Case in point – another of the recommendations outlined in the report advocates establishing a Paternity Allowance and an Adoption Allowance for self-employed parents, but unequal NICs will inevitably be used as moral justification for the fewer rights for the self-employed until the gap is closed. An increase in NICs for higher earners would bring in the extra funding necessary for the Government to introduce these allowances, literally paying for itself. We’ll be covering this topic in more detail in a separate upcoming blog.
There is increasing concern in the Treasury that the rise in self-employment, and in particular the growth of gig work enabled by platforms like Uber and Deliveroo, may serve to worsen the state of the public finances. Indeed the TUC estimate it may be as much as £4bn is being lost in tax revenue due to low-wage work including ‘gig workers’.
For decision-makers to represent the self-employed fairly and considerately, any resentment or lingering assumption that they are a drain on the economy must be done away with.
Proposed National Insurance solutions
The report sets out five suggested guidelines that the Treasury’s Office of Tax Simplification might like to explore in order to solve the issue, building on their previous work on this area
Increase NICs for self-employed workers from 9% to 12% in line with employees, but keep employer NICs the same.
Increase NICs for self-employed workers as above, but also change employer NICs into a ‘transaction tax’ to be paid by any household or business using the services of any worker, self-employed or employee.
Increase NICs for self-employed workers as with above, but employer NICs are reconstructed as a ‘payroll tax plus’, with employers paying a levy for all workers they employ, including independent contractors.
Merge all NICs (including employers’) into a universal system, where everyone pays the same rate.
Some of these options would be major, politically challenging changes. But as the nature of work continues to evolve, isn’t it time we took a big, bold look at the tax system?
Do you think this is a good idea? Would you welcome paying more National Insurance contributions if it meant getting the same entitlements as a full-time employee? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!